quarta-feira, 30 de novembro de 2011
Particularidades no Diagóstico Morte Encefálica
Paciente com diagnóstico etiológico definido, sem fatores confundidores (hipotermia e ou substâncias depressoras do sistema nervoso central).
Pressão perfusão cerebral determinada pela PAM invasiva e PIC igual a zero.
Ao exame:
Pupilas médio e fixas
Reflexo oculocefálico ausente
Reflexo oculovestibular ausente
Reflexo corneopalpebral ausente
Reflexo tosse ausente
Padrão ventilatório determinado pelo ventilador mecânico
Mobilidade cervical desencadeia movimento de flexão dos antebraços.
Abrir protocolo ME ?
terça-feira, 15 de novembro de 2011
Salina Hipertônica x Manitol
Como otimizar seu uso?
Quando utilizar uma ou outra?
Existe uma melhor estratégia de utilização?
Comparison of mannitol and hypertonic saline in the treatment of severe brain injuries
Clinical article
Nikolaos Sakellaridis, M.D.,1 Elias Pavlou, M.D.,2 Stylianos Karatzas, M.D.,3 Despina Chroni, M.D.,4 Konstantinos Vlachos, M.D.,1 Konstantinos Chatzopoulos, F.R.C.S.,2 Eleni Dimopoulou, F.R.C.P.,4 Christos Kelesis, B.Sc.,1 and Vasiliki Karaouli, F.R.C.P.3
1Department of Neurosurgery, 2First Intensive Care Unit, 3University of Athens Department of Intensive Care,
and 4Second Intensive Care Unit, KAT National Hospital, Attica, Greece
Object. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of mannitol and hypertonic saline in doses of similar
osmotic burden for the treatment of intracranial hypertension in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.
Methods. The authors used an alternating treatment protocol to compare the effect of hypertonic saline with that
of mannitol given for episodes of increased intracranial pressure in patients treated for severe head injury at their
hospital during 2006–2008. Standard guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury were followed.
Elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) was treated either with mannitol or hypertonic saline. Doses of similar osmotic
burden (mannitol 20%, 2 ml/kg, infused over 20 minutes, or saline 15%, 0.42 ml/kg, administered as a bolus via a
central venous catheter) were given alternately to the individual patient with severe brain injury during episodes of
increased pressure. The dependent variables were the extent and duration of reduction of increased ICP. The choice
of agent for treatment of the initial hypertensive event was determined on a randomized basis; treatment was alternated
for every subsequent event in each individual patient. Reduction of ICP and duration of action were recorded
after each event. Results obtained after mannitol administration were statistically compared with those obtained after
hypertonic saline administration.
Results. Data pertaining to 199 hypertensive events in 29 patients were collected. The mean decrease in ICP
obtained with mannitol was 7.96 mm Hg and that obtained with hypertonic saline was 8.43 mm Hg (p = 0.586, equal
variances assumed). The mean duration of effect was 3 hours 33 minutes for mannitol and 4 hours 17 minutes for
hypertonic saline (p = 0.40, equal variances assumed).
Conclusions. No difference between the 2 medications could be found with respect to the extent of reduction of
ICP or duration of action. (DOI: 10.3171/2010.5.JNS091685)
Key Words • mannitol • hypertonic saline • trauma • brain injury •intracranial hypertension • osmotic burden
Quando utilizar uma ou outra?
Existe uma melhor estratégia de utilização?
Comparison of mannitol and hypertonic saline in the treatment of severe brain injuries
Clinical article
Nikolaos Sakellaridis, M.D.,1 Elias Pavlou, M.D.,2 Stylianos Karatzas, M.D.,3 Despina Chroni, M.D.,4 Konstantinos Vlachos, M.D.,1 Konstantinos Chatzopoulos, F.R.C.S.,2 Eleni Dimopoulou, F.R.C.P.,4 Christos Kelesis, B.Sc.,1 and Vasiliki Karaouli, F.R.C.P.3
1Department of Neurosurgery, 2First Intensive Care Unit, 3University of Athens Department of Intensive Care,
and 4Second Intensive Care Unit, KAT National Hospital, Attica, Greece
Object. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of mannitol and hypertonic saline in doses of similar
osmotic burden for the treatment of intracranial hypertension in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.
Methods. The authors used an alternating treatment protocol to compare the effect of hypertonic saline with that
of mannitol given for episodes of increased intracranial pressure in patients treated for severe head injury at their
hospital during 2006–2008. Standard guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury were followed.
Elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) was treated either with mannitol or hypertonic saline. Doses of similar osmotic
burden (mannitol 20%, 2 ml/kg, infused over 20 minutes, or saline 15%, 0.42 ml/kg, administered as a bolus via a
central venous catheter) were given alternately to the individual patient with severe brain injury during episodes of
increased pressure. The dependent variables were the extent and duration of reduction of increased ICP. The choice
of agent for treatment of the initial hypertensive event was determined on a randomized basis; treatment was alternated
for every subsequent event in each individual patient. Reduction of ICP and duration of action were recorded
after each event. Results obtained after mannitol administration were statistically compared with those obtained after
hypertonic saline administration.
Results. Data pertaining to 199 hypertensive events in 29 patients were collected. The mean decrease in ICP
obtained with mannitol was 7.96 mm Hg and that obtained with hypertonic saline was 8.43 mm Hg (p = 0.586, equal
variances assumed). The mean duration of effect was 3 hours 33 minutes for mannitol and 4 hours 17 minutes for
hypertonic saline (p = 0.40, equal variances assumed).
Conclusions. No difference between the 2 medications could be found with respect to the extent of reduction of
ICP or duration of action. (DOI: 10.3171/2010.5.JNS091685)
Key Words • mannitol • hypertonic saline • trauma • brain injury •intracranial hypertension • osmotic burden
Assinar:
Postagens (Atom)